Jun
25
2007
2

Round 12: Richmond v Melbourne

You’d think I’d be happy about the tigers first win…Well I am! However; it doesn’t stop the utter frustration from the abysmal umpiring…wait, let me clarify…the abysmal rule interpretation that these poor guys are made to enforce!!! Surely the umpires of the AFL have a legitimate case to put to Workplace Relations for unfair working conditions???

The 3rd quarter was the worst with 11–1 free kicks (or thereabouts) there was no more than 30 seconds of genuine play in between each free kick given…What I would give just to see a contest again!!! There are clearly too many rules, if you wanted to be pedantic, you could quite easily pay a free kick at every single contest! To have that potential clearly means that the AFL is over umpiring the game!!!

Back to the game… Finally something to smile about – the tigers have found some form of late, with the greatest losing margin in the last 5 rounds being no more than 21 points which was against Fremantle last round. Excluding that, 9 points is the next best (or worst) depending on how you look at it, against Adelaide in Adelaide.

The young tiger cubs are really starting to take the next step and become exceptional footballers. With the likes of Deledio, Foley, King, Jackson, Pattison & Polak who just turned 23 last week.

Nathan Foley was outstanding again, he just gets so much of the ball and his skills have improved dramatically over last year. He just hits a target consistently, a real highlight of the year watching him thrive. With 12 kicks and 11 handballs, he was instrumental in driving the tigers forward at the stoppages. In addition to Foley, Brett Deledio has also been outstanding this season. Although he has been quite in a few rounds, his good games have been outstanding. Friday night was no exception, taking contested marks, out running opponents with the ball and hitting targets with each of his 23 disposals, he has really shown that he was the number one draft pick in 2004. Finally Richmond used their priority pick with diligence!
Will Thursfield was outstanding as well finally getting back the form he had built up prior to doing his knee against St Kilda last season. He just smothered Robertson and clearly came out the winner in that contest. Although he didn’t have many possessions, he kept Russell Robertson to a measly 11 disposals.

Jake King, playing only his 9th career game is a rookie who has just taken to the game without a problem. Although he started the season slowly, struggling to keep up with the pace of the AFL, he has quickly slid into the groove and on Friday night, repaid the faith that Terry Wallace and the match committee has shown in him with an outstanding game. He is not afraid to take them on with plenty of run and finishing the game with 16 kicks and 5 handballs, he was everywhere the ball was.

Other notable mentions go to Graham Polak who was simply awesome with his 28 disposals and 11 marks, quelling many forward thrusts by Melbourne and stabilising a once fragile backline. Daniel Jackson is maturing, Greg Tivendale showed experience, Shane Tuck worked as hard as ever, Chris Hyde is very polished with his skills and Chris Newman just continues to show composure when under fire.

Adam Pattison still has a long way to go however, continues to show promise.

The true heroes of the night were the dynamic duo Matthew Richardson and Nathan Brown. Browny just showed he has still got it after nearly two years out of the game. His polished skills just shone through with precision marking and kicking. He rarely fumbles or miss-kicks and he frees up Pettifer to roam and kick his required 2-3 goals. Richo was outstanding with his 16 marks and 23 disposals – He was everywhere. Unfortunately his poor kicking for goal let him and the team down with a below par 3.6. This does not include the 3 other opportunities that were rushed through and the 3 that he gave off as assists to team-mates. If he had capitalised on his opportunities, he could have easily kicked 12 goals and the margin would have been far greater. If this guy could kick for goal, I truly believe that Richo would be pushing the all-time goal kicking record that Lockett holds of 1357…

On a not so positive note, Andrew Raines was disappointing. He has so much promise and can be so exciting however, his decision making and disposal just continually lets him, and the team down. A few times on Friday night he blindly turned into trouble or just didn’t even look at his options before disposing and he continually disposes to players who themselves are under immense pressure. There is still a lot of room for improvement in this kid and hopefully we can persist with him and help him hone these important skills.

Next week we face a depleted St Kilda after the long trek across the nullabor. Hopefully we can continue the winning run and turn one win into 2 and hopefully Nathan Brown can just continue to get better as the year draws to an end.

Written by in: Richmond Tigers | Tags: , , , , ,
Jun
24
2007
0

Demetriou – The rule is NOT WORKING!!!

Kevin Sheedy, Shane Crawford & Nathan Buckley have all come out in the Herald Sun and agreed that the push in the back rule is an abysmal failure and it needs to be revoked ASAP. The issue is, as I eluded to in my previous letter, the AFL are to stubborn and obnoxious and simply refuse to admit THEY GOT IT WRONG!!!

Andrew Demetriou and Kevin Bartlett – Get over yourselves and admit you got it wrong! If you love our game you will put aside your own personal pride for the greater good of the game! You just know Demetriou is sitting back rubbing their hands thinking “attendances are up, profits are up, What problem? The fact of the matter is that the AFL is now a corporation and are only interested in growing revenue instead of preserving our age old game…

Written by in: Andrew Demetriou | Tags: , ,
Jun
04
2007
0

Andrew Demetriou's response to My Letter

I write in regard to your letter detailing the interpretation changes we have made to the game in recent years, and particularly the hands in the back Laws of our Game.

The AFL has looked closely at the Laws of the Game for several years and the overwhelming feedback from our supporters has been to make as few changes as possible.

prednisone oral

That said, the AFL Commission and the Laws of the Game Committee have studied detailed examinations of the trends in AFL football over the last 40 years.

This research had shown the style of game to the end of 2005 at the elite level had continuously trended towards a greater density of players around the ball, less contested marking and less one-on-one contests. Further, the ball moves quicker than ever in our game, when it moves, but it had begun to spend more time at stop-play situations than ever before in our history, with a greater number of bounces and throw-ins than ever before.

At the end of 2005, we had reached a point where the ball was moving less at any time in the game’s history, and we have sought to address that.

It was the AFL’s view therefore, through the Laws of the Game Committee, that we should direct umpires to return more strictly to the letter of the Law Book, and umpire towards what is directed in the Laws of our game. Not to change or introduce new Laws, which is what our supporters do not wish us to do.

In regard to the Law you talk about, it says plainly in our Law book that any hand in the back, for any marking contest, should be a free kick. We have asked umpires to use this strict interpretation, which it fact makes it easier for our umpires to umpire the game.

Where you mention that players will have someone coming back towards them, the AFL’s instruction to our clubs has been that players viagra tablets 100mg should return to traditional bodywork to hold out an opponent – using a hip, a shoulder, their body or a braced forearm – but not a hand at any stage.

The AFL, as one of our core objectives when examining the direction of

our game, is to enhance and maintain the appeal of AFL football as an outstanding sport for spectators and players.
Our focus for the changes that occurred in 2006 and 2007 was to see a more continuous style of play, with less players around the ball and a reduction in the likelihood of high-impact collision injuries.

That has been the reason behind what we have done as the AFL is determined to ensure our game remains different to every other sport and I would happy to forward to you the the detailed background research viewed by the Laws of the Game committee and the AFL Commission as part of their deliberations.

Kind regards
Andrew Demetriou

May
31
2007
0

Push In The Back – My Suggestion

The problem with the current rule is that it is nearly impoessible for an umpire to interpret the difference between a push in the back and someone trying to stand their ground and hold the player in front at bay. To say that the player in the rear can use his forearm is ridiculous, all this will do is reduce the amount of marks taken in a game, to be quite frank, that is already overumpired and ugly !!! More time on the ground scurrying after the ball – no thanks!

My suggested improvement is as follows – If the player in front that is alledgedly being infringed upon is in a forward motion then the rule should be enforced – This is what the rule is for, the player first to the ball should not be disadvantaged by a nudge in the back to get him out of the way. Now, this rule should be restricted to a push by hand or forearm only. Body on body contact should be considered incidental and not penalised.

natural alternative to viagra or cialis

If the player

in front stops, props or tries to push back against the player behind him, then he loses all rights relating to the in the back rule.

I can see issues already with Matthew Lloyd diving forward but this has been a problem for years and will remain a problem when it is left to human interpretation.

Interested to hear anyone elses thoughts on this subject or a better way to interpret the rule because quite clearly, it isn’t cheap viagra working in its current form!

Written by in: AFL | Tags: , ,
May
31
2007
3

AFL Rules – My Letter to the AFL

Our game is almost in state of disrepair. Our rules are without question the worst of any sport going around in the world. I am a proud and paid up RFC member however I thank god that Melbourne Victory and Storm have emerged because I get no satisfaction watching the poor excuse that has become AFL and it’s rules.

For years I have blamed umpires and have left games incensed imaging how satisfying it would be to hurt the umpires but as I’ve aged I’ve come to the realisation that it is not their fault 80% of the time. They have been forced to employ ridiculous and ambiguous rules that most of the time make no sense whatsoever. 99% of the time at any given match, when an umpire blows his whistle I’m forced to look his way in anticipation that maybe he’s picked something out that goes our way because god knows, there is no way of identifying the real free kick.

how to buy viagra cheap

I also find myself watching body on body incidents, which make up 80% of the game and each time contact is made, no matter how small, I find myself looking towards the umpire in prayer that he will not once again blow his whistle and pay another ridiculous, indecipherable free kick!

I watched the Richmond v West Coast game recently and saw some of the most frustrating umpiring in the AFL. I then read Jeff Gieschen’s review stating that they didn’t get it that wrong, only 5 decisions were questionable… The problem wasn’t with the decisions that were made, it was with the ones that weren’t!!! This entire incident was just a clear indication of the AFL and Umpires complete disconnect with the game. You can’t imagine the frustration that this brings to the general public, myself included.

I implore you to review the rules immediately as I can no longer put myself through the torture that is an AFL game. I miss the days of old, just being able to support my team.
The rules that need refinement are as follows:

Holding the ball – this is the most ambiguous rule going around and it is also the most frustrating, especially “dragging it in?. Nine out of ten times a player will get the ball, whilst on the ground and then be pinned by an opposition player giving him no possible way of disposing of the ball. This should not be a free kick. The opposition player is the one delaying play by locking the player and ball down, why should the play maker be penalised for this?

Another extremely appalling interpretation of this rule comes from the definition of prior opportunity. If a player grabs the ball and is under immediate pressure and tries to run his lines and break a tackle, he is penalised for trying to break the tackle, apparently this relinquishes any claim to prior opportunity! How I’ll never know… If that same player stops in his footsteps and is tackled, a ball up is called due to lack of prior opportunity!!! This rule paints the unimaginable picture of; try to create play and you’ll be penalised, stop and give up, and we’ll let you off! How can the AFL knowingly enforce this rule???

In the back – I still can’t feasibly understand the purpose of this rule. I think that the rule should be applicable if moving towards a boundary fence or if a player is “dangerously? pushed in the back directly into other players but in general play, what is the point of it??? This new interpretation of the rule is nothing more that pure torture… watching the umpires employ this rule just leaves me sitting emotionless thinking, this is what our game has come to now, getting frustrated only pains me, no-one else, especially when I watch a player protect himself from someone backing into him and is penalised for it!!! You have got to be kidding!

If a player is chasing another player from behind, the natural force of inertia always forces both players forward and 9 times out of 10 ends up in an in the back decision. How can you tackle someone in this manner without giving away a free kick? You can’t because once again, our rules are the most comedic of any sport or code going around.

Rethink this rule, there is little to no logic in having it, you are legally allowed to push some in the side but not the back? Remove it completely and replace it with a rough or dangerous play rule. It serves absolutely no purpose in protecting players.

Head high – I watched a disgraceful decision in the VFL in the Geelong v Casey game where a player (1), running back with the flight attempted to get a hand on the ball, all the time, eyes up watching the ball. A guy leading out (2), doing the same thing ended up running into him and falling down. Player 1 had his arm in the air attempting to get a hand on the ball and player 2’s head hit his arm on the way through. Free kick head high!!! I agree the head is sacrosanct however it should not be the sole responsibility of the opposing player to ensure safety. Responsibility should be shared between the two. Player 2 has the same duty of care going into that contest and therefore the decision should have been play on.

Players are now onto this rule and now simply duck towards the player in anticipation of getting touched head high and it is starting to pay off because the umpires are trigger happy and immediately blow the whistle in any head high encounter.

This rule needs to be scrapped and replaced with a dangerous clause where the player recklessly or intentionally causes harm. Accidental inconsequential contact should not be penalised as the infringed player should have some responsibility in the incident. Use Gaspar’s incident on Lynch as the perfect example, Gaspar, eyes on the ball, was charged by Lynch to put him off balance and get a better position. In this exchange, Gaspar’s hand flung up in a natural balance gaining manner and Lynch’s face ran straight into his hand. Lynch’s free kick!!! The exchange was accidental, inconsequential contact and it was completely and utterly caused by the infringed player. This is the prime example of the poor execution of this rule and should be the catalyst for the rule’s revision or replacement.

I hope that this letter is read as it is intended which is a plea for help for my once much loved game. I can barely bring myself to

go anymore and as I said no prescription amoxicillin earlier, thank god for Melbourne Victory and Storm as it at least gives me some sport to watch in these times where our game is nothing short of a train wreck.

=== Footnote ===
I have sent this to Andrew Demetriou ([email protected]), Andrian Anderson ([email protected]), Kevin Bartlett ([email protected]), Morning Glory @ SEN ([email protected]), Mike Sheehan ([email protected]), Herald Sun ([email protected]), The Age ([email protected]), Umpires Association ([email protected]), Sams Mailbag ([email protected]) 4 times now and still no response…
Please help and support me by sending through your thoughts and feedback to all of these people – maybe we will finally be heard!

Powered by WordPress | Theme: FreeUsenext